What in the world does the word folk mean in
2004, LI ROBBINS asks. The answer, my friend, is blowing in the prevailing
winds of change.
By LI ROBBINS - Saturday, January 31, 2004
Other peoples' parents had cocktail parties. Mine had
hootenannies, during which the invocation of the name Pete Seeger made
it clear he was closer to God than the Pearly Gates. This was at the
height of the folk era, when there were no serious doubts as to the
defining characteristics of the various strands of music called folk
-- commercial Kingston Trio manifestations aside. The ethic of folk
was clear. It was old and young enthusiastically singing or marching
to protest injustice, or better still, doing both simultaneously. Folk
was rousing choruses about overcoming, some day, or about fiercely
maintaining your principles and thus preventing your union from being
busted.
But then came folk-rock. And
singer-songwriters. And finally something called roots music. The
comfy gatherings known as folk festivals began, including bands that
shocked the faithful by out-Dylan-ing Bob -- not only were there
electric guitars, there were groups that wouldn't be amiss in rock
clubs. Not to mention aggregations of musicians performing something
called "world music." By the 21st century, folk as a recognizable
genre would seem to have vanished.
Brian Gladstone,
festival director of the 2nd annual Winterfolk, an indoor folk
festival held in downtown Toronto (Jan. 30-Feb. 1), doesn't agree.
"The new folk revolution is happening beneath our feet -- like the new
millennium version of the great roots awakening we saw in the
Sixties," Gladstone says.
That said, Gladstone
isn't willing to parse the nuances of folk and related terminology,
the singer-songwriters versus roots. Yet Winterfolk's roster is
clearly closer to the original Sixties' folk proposition -- guys and
gals with guitars -- than it is to any sprawling notion of folk music.
"We wanted to focus on singers who write their own material," says
Gladstone. "And on guitar
players. We didn't go the route of bringing in headliners, the way
many summer folk festivals do. It's part of the ethic of this festival
-- everyone has equal status."
That's an ethic in keeping with the Sixties' attitude -- "have
guitar, will sing protest song." But not in keeping with the
prevailing winds of change endorsed by folk music's largest
professional association, the Folk Alliance, based in Silver Spring,
Md. One of its key strategic goals is to "change the face of the Folk
Alliance," both membership and leadership, in recognition of the
"ethnic and cultural diversity of North America." It's also a
recognition of the logic of coalition building with folk music's
closest, equally marginalized cousin -- world music.
"The folk world has ebbed and flowed in terms of what the audience
looks like, and we want to represent the whole spectrum," says Phyllis
Barney, executive director of the Folk Alliance. "Folk music is not a
very small box any more."
Barney credits the Canadian branch of the Folk Alliance with
forging this new direction, saying that some of the presenters based
in Canada, with its acclaimed multicultural make-up, have been "very
open and creative." The umbrella American organization has followed
suit. This union might seem to only muddy the "what is folk music"
waters (and yes, blues is sometimes also included as "folk"), as well
as the Folk Alliance's own goal of "creating a working definition of
folk music for media use."
"It's the "F"-word problem," jokes Barney. "There are so many
misconceptions about folk. Everyone seems to have their snapshot --
for one person it's Bob Dylan, for another it's Bulgarian throat
singing, for another it might be bluegrass or Celtic. It's easier to
describe the attributes -- it's music from the community that speaks
with universal themes, it's accessible, people feel comfortable with
it, and feel a sense of ownership."
Any hope of reclaiming the "F"-word was probably not abetted by the
most recent public kick at the folk can, Christopher Guest's 2003
mockumentary A Mighty Wind. Although many critics felt the
movie was almost too deferential in its treatment of the "commercial"
end of folk, the film presented the music as a kitschy souvenir of
time and place, not as vibrant, evolving, or even marginally aware of
its own fallibilities. It also largely ignored the sorts of artists
who were the soul and lifeblood of folk, people such as Pete Seeger
and Woody Guthrie. Ironically, the latter's music is one of the most
direct conduits to a notion of a folk-music continuum, with Guthrie's
work successfully being performed in ways he never heard in his
lifetime -- through the alt-country band Wilco with British rocker
Billy Bragg, and New York's radical klezmer band, the Klezmatics, for
example.
This fresh view of Guthrie's work isn't only because of the
compelling stew of whimsy and profound politics found in his songs.
It's also driven by the continuing efforts of the Woody Guthrie
Foundation and Archives, directed by Guthrie's daughter Nora. She's a
passionate voice for her father's approach to folk. "Woody said, 'all
you can write is what you see' -- his credo for songwriting," Nora
Guthrie says. "But maybe today some only see by watching TV, or by
only looking at themselves. There are embarrassingly few great folk
singers now."
In Nora Guthrie's take on her father's vision, folk isn't about a
style of music, a particular language, or electric versus acoustic
instrumentation -- it's about truth telling.
"Folk is inherently about social issues, about causes. Folk music
has gone out of fashion because it's very difficult to live that life,
to be intelligent enough, strong enough. Although maybe people are
doing it in other ways, like Michael Moore in filmmaking." Guthrie
adds.
"You have to be willing to lose everything. . . . You might have
success, but you can't be too attached to it. Not if you're going to
speak the truth and say what you see."
It seems unlikely the "F"-word will ever again signal a commonly
held understanding of a contemporary genre of music. More likely it
will continue to sit uncomfortably alongside "roots" and
"singer-songwriter." Perhaps Guthrie's interpretation of folk as being
a way of interpreting life will have more continuing meaning. For as
Louis Armstrong once put it: "All music is folk music. I ain't never
heard a horse sing a song."